• العربية
    • English
  • English 
    • العربية
    • English
  • Login
Home
Publisher PoliciesTerms of InterestHelp Videos
Submit Thesis
IntroductionIUGSpace Policies
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Health Science
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Health Sciences
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Health Science
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Health Sciences
  • View Item

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12358/29140
TitleGuidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1
Title in Arabicإرشادات لاستخدام وتفسير التجارب لرصد الالتهام الذاتي (الطبعة الرابعة)
Abstract

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

Authors
Klionsky, Daniel
Abdel-Aziz, Amal
Abdelfatah, Sara
Abdellatif, Mahmoud
Abdoli, Asghar
Abel, Steffen
Abeliovich, Hagai
Alzaharna, Mazen
Aliwaini, Saeb
TypeJournal Article
Date2021-01-02
LanguageEnglish
Subjects
Autophagosome
LC3
cancer
flux
lysosome
macroautophagy
neurodegeneration
phagophore
stress
vacuole.
Published inAutophagy
SeriesVol. 17, No. 1
PublisherInforma UK Limited
Citation
Item linkItem Link
DOI10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
ISSN15548627,15548635
License
Collections
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Health Sciences [253]
Files in this item
Main Article37.41Mb
Thumbnail

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of IUGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisors

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback