• العربية
    • English
  • English 
    • العربية
    • English
  • Login
Home
Publisher PoliciesTerms of InterestHelp Videos
Submit Thesis
IntroductionIUGSpace Policies
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Engineering
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Engineering
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Engineering
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Engineering
  • View Item

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12358/29058
TitleRole of expanded clay aggregate, metakaolin and silica fume on the of modified lightweight concrete properties
Title in ArabicRole of expanded clay aggregate, metakaolin and silica fume on the of modified lightweight concrete properties
Abstract

This investigation aimed to assess the effect of micro-cementitious materials on the mechanical properties and sulphate resistance of modified eco-efficient lightweight concrete (MDLWC). A modified lightweight concrete (MDLWC) was produced by mixing Light-expanded clay aggregate (LECA) with normal coarse aggregate (dolomite cushed rock). The impact of using different percentage of micro-cementitious materials which was micro silica fume (5–20%) and metakaolin(10–35%) on the mechanical properties (compressive strength, splitting tensile and flexural strength), waves transmission velocity of the ultrasonic pulses and sulphate resistivity of MDLWC was studied. The overall results illustrated that the use of micro-cementitious materials in MDLWC caused an enhancement on MDLWC properties. However, the MDLWC specimens containing micro silica fume showed better results than metakaolin. The best results were observed while using samples containing 10% micro silica fume and 30 % metakaolin individually or combined. In addition, the usage of combined mixture of 10% micro silica fume and 30% metakaolin MDLWC mix showed the best improvement rate in compressive, splitting tensile and flexural strengths by 25, 53.3 and 66.6%, respectively, compared to control MDLWC specimens. On the other hand, the direct empirical equations were proposed on the basis of strong and nonlinear regression analysis using the test data to predict the mechanical properties of MDLWC relationships, rationally. Experimental tests were conducted on ultrasonic pulses velocity, which showed good correlation equation strength of MDLWC. Scanning electron microscopy illustrated that the pores of concrete is smaller for SF and MK individually or combined with MDLWC compared to the control concrete, demonstrating an enhancement within the interfacial microstructure with the pozzolanas incorporation. The previous difference could be explained due to the concrete strength and sulphate penetrability to an extent.

Authors
Tawfik, Taher A.
AlSaffar, Doha M.
Tayeh, Bassam A.
Metwally, Khaled Ali
ElKattan, Ibrahim M.
TypeJournal Article
Date2021-05-04
LanguageEnglish
Subjects
Mechanical properties
modified light weight concrete (MDLWC)
ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV)
leca
sulphate resistivity
Published inGeosystem Engineering
SeriesVol. 24, No. 3
PublisherInforma UK Limited
Citation
Item linkItem Link
DOI10.1080/12269328.2021.1887002
ISSN12269328,21663394
License
Collections
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Engineering [1035]
Files in this item
file1.pdf766bytes
Thumbnail

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of IUGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisors

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback