• العربية
    • English
  • English 
    • العربية
    • English
  • Login
Home
Publisher PoliciesTerms of InterestHelp Videos
Submit Thesis
IntroductionIUGSpace Policies
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Art
  • Conferences
  • The scientific conference "The objective shifts in the Palestinian cause after Oslo"
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Art
  • Conferences
  • The scientific conference "The objective shifts in the Palestinian cause after Oslo"
  • View Item

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12358/28461
Titleالمواقف الإقليمية من العدوان الإسرائيلي على قطاع غزة (2008-2014) (مصر وتركيا نموذجاً) رؤية سياسية تحليلية
Title in Arabicالمواقف الإقليمية من العدوان الإسرائيلي على قطاع غزة (2008-2014) (مصر وتركيا نموذجاً) رؤية سياسية تحليلية
Abstract

The Gaza strip has started to arrest the attention of all regional and international powers after the superiority of Hamas attaining the overwhelming majority in the Palestinian Legislative Elections of 2006; also after the Palestinian internal schizm, which took place in the year after. The regional standpoints about the three Israeli aggressions against the Gaza strip between 2008 and 2014 were different: from condemnation and absolute discrepancy on the one hand to discretion and abandonment on the other. At the time we observed –on the official and popular levels -the Turkish condemnation and rejection of these three aggressions together with the very strong and decisive language of the Turkish government, we also noticed –on the Egyptian popular level- three discrepant standpoints on. During the 2008 aggression, the Egyptian government found it more than enough to condemn the aggression in the media, declaring the responsibility of Hamas for the escalation, which led to the breakout of the aggression, whereas the Egyptian popular standpoint was totally against the aggression as seen in the non-stop anti-war demonstrations. During the 2012 aggression, the Egyptian official standpoint was more progressive and more distinctive through not only condemnation and rejection but through acts, measures and procedures that were stricter, stronger and more decisive against the state of occupation, Israel. The popular standpoint of Egypt in the 2012 aggression did not differ from that in 2008; but in 2014 aggression, the Egyptian standpoint was -on the official and popular levels- not only far below mediocre, but also it was worse than that when it became closer to collusion as the Egyptian government considered the Palestinian Resistance Factions responsible for the breakout of the aggression on the one hand and on the other released the cease–fire initiative which responded to the Israeli conditions but had no response, in any of its terms or items, to any of the military achievements of resistance.

Authors
أبو نحل, أسامة محمد
الأخرس, سامي محمد
TypeConference Paper
Date2016-04-10
Languageالعربية
Subjects
المواقف الإقليمية
العدوان الإسرائيلي
قطاع غزة
Published inالتحولات الموضوعية في القضية الفلسطينية بعد أوسلو
Publisherالجامعة الإسلامية - غزة
Citation
LicenseCC-BY
Collections
  • The scientific conference "The objective shifts in the Palestinian cause after Oslo" [33]
Files in this item
file_1.pdf682.4Kb
Thumbnail

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of IUGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisors

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback