• العربية
    • English
  • English 
    • العربية
    • English
  • Login
Home
Publisher PoliciesTerms of InterestHelp Videos
Submit Thesis
IntroductionIUGSpace Policies
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Information Technology
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Information Technology
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Information Technology
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Information Technology
  • View Item

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12358/27137
TitleA Comparative Study of DCT and DWT Image Compression Techniques combined with Huffman coding
Title in Arabicدراسة مقارنة بين خوارزميات تقنيتي DCT و DWT مع استخدام ترميز هوفمان
Abstract

Image compression techniques have been widely used to store and transmit data which requires storage space and high transfer speed. The explosive growth of high-quality photos leads to the requirement of efficient technique to store and exchange data over the internet. In this paper, we present a comparative study to compare between the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) algorithms in combination with Huffman algorithm; DCT-H and DWT-H. The comparison is based on five factors: Compression Ratio (CR), Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and compression/decompression time. The experiments are conducted on five BMP gray-scale file images. We found out that DWT-H coding is comparable to DCT-H coding in term of CR and outperforms DCT-H in terms of MSE, PSNR and SSIM. The CR average results of the five test images for DCT-H and DWT-H are 2.36 and 3.17, respectively. Moreover, DCT-H has the average results of MSE = 13.19, PSNR = 37.15 and SSIM = 0.76, while WDT-H has the average results of MSE = 4.54, PSNR = 42.5 and SSIM = 0.85. On the other hand, DCT-H outperforms DWT-H in term of execution time for compression and decompression. DCT-H has an average compression time of 0.358s and an average decompression time of 0.122s, while WDT-H has 2.38s compression time and 2.13s decompression time.

Authors
Maghari, Ashraf Y. A.
TypeJournal Article
Date2019-08
LanguageEnglish
Subjects
Image compression
DCT
DWT
Huffman coding
PSNR
SSIM
Published inJordanian Journal of Computers and Information Technology
SeriesVol. 05, No. 02
PublisherScopeMed Publishing
Citation
Item linkItem Link
DOI10.5455/jjcit.71-1554982934
ISSN24139351
License
Collections
  • Staff Publications- Faculty of Information Technology [192]
Files in this item
2-DOI 10.5455-jjcit.71-1554982934.pdf1.373Mb
Thumbnail

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of IUGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSupervisors

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

The institutional repository of the Islamic University of Gaza was established as part of the ROMOR project that has been co-funded with support from the European Commission under the ERASMUS + European programme. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Contact Us | Send Feedback